« Oh, we don't serve St. David's | Main | Pot calling the kettle black? »

July 11, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452cca869e200e008d636558834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Qualitative or Quantitative?:

Comments

Less is More

Progressive Minds seems to have adopted "less is more" quite wholeheartedly.

They are blocking comments they see as hostile to the PLP, and in some cases editing out sentences from posts that are allowed.

S Brown

Mr. Pitcher,
Did it ever occur to you that some of those cruise ship passengers may return via air depending on the experience they had on the island? Lets face it, most people overseas mistake Bermuda as a typical caribbean island, despite how you pitch it to them. Now if they came and experienced Bermuda for a day or two, most likely they would spread the word about Bermuda, possibly attracting visitors who would travel via plane.

Like I stated before, I understand your views, but I do not agree with them.

I feel Bermuda should attract people period, not just the "rich". Bermuda is a beautiful place that people should experience, not just wealthy people.

Part of the reason I feel this way, is that I couldnt stand the fact of people coming to my island and enjoy the beauty but look down upon the people (from my personal experiences and from friends who work at Elbow Beach).

A few things I realized though, you said many attractions were sold out due to cruise ship visitors, you could not get a taxi (even though ferry services were provided to and from the pink party up to 4am), resturants were booked to compacity etc..

So the fact is these cruise ship passengers ARE SPENDING MONEY IN BERMUDA!!! So what is the problem? So I assume a rich person spending the same amount of money as a 'common person'is more valuable to Bermuda?

Its funny, a few years ago we were complaining that we are not getting visitors in Bermuda, all of a sudden we have visitors but yet that is still not good enough.

Another fact that you forget, lets says if we did just cater to vistors who travel via air.. what if another 9/11 incident occurs? Then what?

Denis Pitcher

S Brown,

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

Reputation is what matters for Bermuda tourism. Sure cruise visitors may decide to fly in next time, they might not. Have you considered the impact if an air visitor raves about their vacation or if they complain? Word of mouth is the greatest and cheapest form of marketing.

"even though ferry services were provided to and from the pink party up to 4am"

Actually, they wern't ferries specifically. They were tour boats. Also, we wanted to leave at 2pm while the boats were not supposed to arrive until 3am and 4am.

We ended up walking around for an hour before taking the 3am boat. One friend who missed the 3am boat hung around for the 4am one which never showed.


"So the fact is these cruise ship passengers ARE SPENDING MONEY IN BERMUDA!!! So what is the problem? So I assume a rich person spending the same amount of money as a 'common person'is more valuable to Bermuda?"

But it isn't the same amount of money being spent. It's all about how much money per visitor. Try riding the bus during the summer time to the east end and you'll get it. They're packed with tourists and it makes it rougher on Bermudians just trying to make it to and from work. Try catching a bus to St. Davids when the east bound bus from hamilton is so packed you can't get on and subsequently end up missing the transfer.

Our roads and beaches are more congested. Our electricity and water are further consumed. We deal with more garbage that pollutes our air and waters.

Perhaps you can't see it. But all these masses of low paying tourists do is brew resentment towards foreigners.

I'd rather see less tourists spending more money, plain and simple.

"Another fact that you forget, lets says if we did just cater to vistors who travel via air.. what if another 9/11 incident occurs? Then what? "

Nice way to pull scare tactics into it. I note that people still flew, though less numbers.

Another twist, what if the next terrorist attack is to blow up a cruise ship full of Americans? What then?

Let's remember that security practices on airlines have gone up 10 fold and 9/11 would be incredibly more difficult to achieve again.

Slowhand

If I am not mistaken, for the most part the Cruise traveller is a different animal from the Air traveller, and there is much less likelihood that they indeed would return via air.

sal

The BullSHit is being spread beyond the brain dead on this island.


http://www.suntimes.com/lifestyles/travel/468656,TRA-News-nation15.article

Bermuda's boom STUDY | No tourism slump for Caribbean island

July 15, 2007 SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico -- Bermuda reported an 18 percent increase in the number of tourists flying into the mid-Atlantic British territory during 2007's first quarter, attributing the boost to an influx of visitors from the United States.

The increase over the same period last year comes as several Caribbean islands are reporting tourism slumps. Jamaica, the Bahamas, Barbados and St. Lucia have all posted decreases in air passengers, according to figures from the Caribbean Tourism Organization.

''All the people who make our tourism product what it is have even more reason to hold their heads high, because this undeniable surge in visitor numbers is coming at a time when our colleagues in the Caribbean are struggling,'' said Premier Ewart Brown, who is also the minister of tourism.

Caymana

Other islands are also feeling the pain of overdeveloping cruise at the expense of stayover.

http://www.caymannetnews.com/news-529--8-8--.html

The comments to this entry are closed.

About

Random musings on politics, finance and life on the 21 square mile string of islands often referred to as Bermuda, by Denis Pitcher.

Email



Twitter musings

    follow me on Twitter



    Subscribe for Email Updates

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    RSS

     Subscribe in a reader

    Powered by TypePad